In 1930, the sound film—in
particular, the sound film with musical numbers (henceforth, the
music film)—invaded Buenos Aires. Film presentations had never been
completely silent. However, the synchronization between film and
sound proved to be a difficult technological problem that was not
solved reliably until the late 1920s. But even before silent films
became “talkies”, their performances were accompanied by music.
Musical entertainment played an important role in the movie theaters.
Not only did music accompany the film during its showing, music was
also played for the entertainment of the audience during breaks and
intermissions. The large movie theaters in Buenos Aires typically
engaged three orchestras: a large “symphonic” orchestra for the
accompaniment of the file, and an orquesta típica
and a jazz band playing alternately during intermissions.
[In the years before the music film made its appearance, music orchestras had become a major attraction with which the owners of the great movie theaters tried to draw in the audience. The most successful of these orchestras was the one of Julio De Caro. It performed at the “Real Cine”, “the last bastion against the music film” (De Caro), for the “fabulous amount” of 14,000 Pesos per month, the singer not included. De Caro's orchestra was financially perhaps the most successful orchestra in Buenos Aires. Some six years earlier at the "Vogue's Club", De Caro secured a contract for the phenomenal amount of 6,500 Pesos per month, which meant that every musician had a monthly salary of more that 1,000 Pesos. A young man making half his salary at the time would have been “an excellent catch for even the most demanding matchmaking mother”.]
[In the years before the music film made its appearance, music orchestras had become a major attraction with which the owners of the great movie theaters tried to draw in the audience. The most successful of these orchestras was the one of Julio De Caro. It performed at the “Real Cine”, “the last bastion against the music film” (De Caro), for the “fabulous amount” of 14,000 Pesos per month, the singer not included. De Caro's orchestra was financially perhaps the most successful orchestra in Buenos Aires. Some six years earlier at the "Vogue's Club", De Caro secured a contract for the phenomenal amount of 6,500 Pesos per month, which meant that every musician had a monthly salary of more that 1,000 Pesos. A young man making half his salary at the time would have been “an excellent catch for even the most demanding matchmaking mother”.]
The music films shown in 1930 broke new ground. Not only were many shot in color and displayed luxuriant sets, they were conceived as musical entertainment, so the music was an integral part of the film. The film provided the music, the singers, and the orchestras. Great news for cinema owners: one could dispense with the orchestras all together! Moreover, while silent movies and later the “talkies” had been a competition to the theater stage, the music film competed with the music stage, too.
In
view of the overwhelming success of the films with the audience, it
is understandable that musicians, composers, song writers, and
playwrights were concerned about their future. Voices were heard
calling for a prohibition of music films. For the owners of the great
movie theaters, the music film was like manna from heaven; others,
who suffered the consequences, foresaw ruin and desperation.
The
following article, published 1930 in Buenos Aires, reflects the
commotion caused by the clamorous success of the music film. The
author does not offer an opinion but renders the beliefs and
sentiments of the parties involved. The pictures included here were
printed after the article. There is no correlation made between the
statements printed in the article and the people shown in the
pictures. The parties cited remained anonymous.
The Music Film Makes the Cinema Orchestras “Sound Off” in Buenos Aires
(By Emilio Dupuy de Lome, Caras y Caretas, Buenos Aires, 1930)An Orchestra Conductor Talks
The music film is our
ruin. We have been expelled by the new North-American invention. No
less than 5,000 musicians are facing the terrible problem of
unemployment. What can we do? To whom can we turn? This invention
will be progress, but it should be prohibited in favor of Argentinian
musicians who, from one day to the next, are pushed into poverty.
A Cinema Owner Talks
Finally we are free of the
orchestras! They had already ruined us as well as the audience: us,
because they impose on us their exploitive way of working; the
audience, because this playing one piece and then resting ten minutes
is not appreciated.
A Composer of Argentinian Music Talks
Step by step, the music
film will terminate the patriotic sentiment of the audience.The music
of Argentina is replaced by North-American music in the films, and
our new generations will get used to listen to nothing else but
shimmys and foxtrots.
José
Razzano, left, and Julio De Caro, right, signing a petition for the
prohibition of music films
|
The Director of an Orquesta Típica Talks
The audience misses our
presence at the movies. We used to be the darling child of cinema
visitors. When we were alternating with jazz orchestras and it was
our turn to play, the audience rejoiced in anticipation of listening
to our mournful tangos. It is the national spirit, pulsating in the
spectators, that the music film is destroying. What do they want with
these records?
A Record Producer Talks
The performer, the text
writer, the composer, the singer of Argentinian music has had few
resources besides the record. The record carried songs, dances, and
melodies to the last corner of the Republic. If the record is a
pillar of support to musicians and authors, to actors and singers,
how can they think of it now as an enemy of the Argentinian musician.
A Distributor of Music Films Talks
I think it is a great
mistake to slander the music film. Progress cannot be stopped with
nationalistic campaigns. The same right to protection that the
musicians are demanding today—asking for a ban on music films,
since they harm a minority of the profession (no more than 250
musicians are out of work due to music films)—should have been
claimed by the cart drivers when the railroad left them with their
carts grounded in the sheds.
A Producer of Argentinian Films Talks
Hopefully, we will be able
to make Argentinian music films. To achieve this, it would suffice if
those who shout against the foreign music film would concern
themselves a little with the corresponding Argentinian industry by
providing their cooperation and support. But when we want to engage a
singer, a tango musician, an orquesta típica,
or any Argentinian jazz band, they let us down by demanding salaries
that Caruso did not earn at the Metropolitan in New York.
An Advocate of the Language Talks
The
music film is one of the greatest catastrophes that has befallen our
people. The music film will slowly but surely destroy our national
identity and make our children forget their Spanish, to speak only
English. Not being used to listen to anything but dialogs and songs
in English at the cinema, the language of their elders will be
forgotten.
A Theater Impresario Talks
We, the Argentinian theater impresarios, are delighted with the music
film. This year [1930], in which the new cinematographic invention
has invaded our theaters, is becoming the most successful one for the
Argentinian theaters. In the first three months they have earned more
than 180,000 pesos more than during the same period last year. I
attribute this to the music film for various reasons: first, this
show is expensive and the audience comes to the theater for that;
second, the neighborhood cinemas that used to draw the audience from
us have raised their prices and are cheating the spectators with
“music films based on phonographs”; and, third, the public—being
used to silent movies—has lost its taste for the talking ones.
A Spectator Talks
When
the film is good, the music cinema is a beauty. This is proven by the
crowds at the theaters which show authentic music films; there are no
more than 40 in all of Buenos Aires. The audience fills the theaters
with interesting films and does not attend the others.
Adolfo Carabelli, leaning against his Victrola, says philosophically: "If one doors closes, a hundred others open..." |
A Composer of Music Talks
There
is another aspect to the problem of the music film, and that is the
invasion of the North-American record, which has taken more than 80%
of sales from the national music record. Why? Because, the music
themes being popularized by such and such a music film, the sale of
the corresponding record is enormous. On the other hand, since now
the audience does not listen to Argentinian music, the sale of the
native record diminishes every day, and we go to ruin.
Finding Open Doors
It
took until 1933 that a full-fledged music film industry developed in
Argentina—then, of course, featuring tango and its greatest stars
such as Carlos Gardel, Libertad Lamarque, and many others. In the
meantime, musicians took advantage of the popularity of the music
film were they could. No one was perhaps more enterprising in finding
outlets for his music and his orchestra than Francisco Canaro.
Canaro
and his orchestra at a recording session
|
As
the music music films gained popularity, Canaro quickly recorded the
most popular pieces—tango or not—on record with his own
orchestra.
Excerpt
from a Odeon-Disco Nacional (Max Glücksmann) advertisement of 1930
|
Five
years later, 1935, Canaro had moved his music to theater stage,
giving musical comedies with tango music, and had bought a film
studio to produce his own music films.
© 2017 Wolfgang Freis
No comments:
Post a Comment